Hypothetically

#Draft Dharma is often taken to mean morality. It isn't. It simply means duty, or more precisely, the right action (Karma) one must do for the best results. The Dharma of a solider of bad king is to serve his king, not to defect. Or is it? I'm not sure. But the point is to make the idea clear. A more clear example can be made when you take entities without agency. The Dharma of the immune system of a bad guy is to defend that guy, not to kill him, knowing he's a bad guy.

A good commie is a good guy who feels that communism can solve world problems. A bad commie is a guy who thinks that the rich should not have what they have and it should be taken from them. In effect, a good commie will always try to sell communism, while a bad commie tries to enforce it. The thing about a good guy is that he will never blame others for his conditions. But the bad guy will use the story of the good guy to fight the rich guys. The bad guy is bad here, because he doesn't have the quality of the good guy that makes him good. He cannot fight for the good guy and claim that he is good, because he is not good, as I've just shown. The act he took on because he was bad cannot redeem him. Analogy: It would be like saying that an impulsive person who shot a bad guy was good because of what he did. No, he decided to kill because he was impulsive, and even if the killed person was bad, that doesn't make his killing good. Now the situation is different if the guy who ...